Bad Allies
Undermining U.S. Digital
Services Leadership
The European Union is actively targeting U.S. tech companies. They have manufactured ambiguous and overreaching regulations tailor made to go after America’s largest digital services providers. Since 2018, the EU has exploitexd these rules to levy billions of dollars of penalties on U.S. companies. While the EU punishes American companies operating across Europe, there are European companies that enjoy unfettered access to the U.S. market. This blatant lack of reciprocity is unsustainable and must be addressed.
If our so-called “allies” want to continue to punish U.S. companies based on regulations targeted at those same companies, then U.S. officials must immediately hold the EU accountable by launching a Section 301 investigation into their unfair practices. The time to stand up for American companies is now. Failure to do so will only strengthen our mutual adversaries, weaken our alliances, and harm innovation in American and Europe alike.
Escalation of EU's Anti-US Tech Tactics
June 2026
The EU Commission reaches preliminary position that Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft’s market leading cloud services should be designated under the Digital Markets Act (DMA). Companies can be fined up to 10% of their total global revenue, the EU could fine AWS and Microsoft billions of dollars.
April 2026
EU fines placed on US companies top a jarring $7 billion in just 2 years. All companies that have ever been fined under the EU’s DMA are American.
Dec. 2025
EU goes after Elon Musk and X and fines the platform $140 million under the Digital Services Act (DSA) because they took issue how the platform operated “blue check marks.”
Sept. 2025
EU hits Google with $3.45 billion fine for so-called “antitrust violations.”
April 2025
The European Commission announced it was fining Apple $571 million and Meta $228 million for alleged breaches of the DMA.
Nov. 2024
EU fines Meta $840 million because it does not like the way the company runs Facebook Marketplace services.
September 2024
Google fined $2.7 billion for so-called “antitrust” violations.
May 2024
A 7th “gatekeeper” is announced by the EU. Unsurprisingly, it was another U.S. company, this time they were going after Booking.com.
March 2024
The EU fines Apple $1.95 billion, one of the largest fines ever imposed by the EU, over app store rules for music streaming.
Sept. 2023
The EU announces the first “gatekeepers” set to be penalized under the new regulations. Five of the six companies targeted were all American companies. These included: Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Microsoft.
May 2023
Meta hit with $1.3 million fine for violating allegedly violating the EU’s data “privacy rules.” (Of note, in 2025 the EU fined CCP owned TikTok for violating the same rule and sending back personal data to China but only fined them $600 million, about half of what US-based Meta was fined.
Nov. 2022
DMA becomes enforceable across the EU.
Feb. 2021
Portugal implements a DST on streaming services – coined as the “Netflix Tax.”, as it largely targeted Netflix, a U.S. company.
Dec. 2020
The EU proposes to introduce the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and Digital Services Act (DSA) proposal.
How the EU is Targeting American Companies
The EU’s strategy has been specifically designed to target the American tech industry. They have crafted arcane and cumbersome regulations directly aimed at US companies, enabling them to extract billions of dollars’ worth of fines, which in turn has led to higher costs for all consumers, including Americans, and lower innovation.
They designed the following regulations to go after American companies:
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
- Forces companies and governments to adhere to strict rules on so-called “data protection,” which means a wholesale handover of data by private entities to US authorities.
- While this rule applies to all companies operating within the EU, they are more focused on targeting US-based companies than the ones based in China.
Digital Markets Act (DMA)
- Designed to go after major U.S. tech companies.
- While falsely branded to promote a “fair market,” six of the seven companies targeted are American.
Digital Services Act (DSA)
- Imposes anti-free speech restrictions on US companies.
- The law was passed under the guise of “illegal and harmful activities” and to “combat misinformation, but it is nothing else than a tool used to police speech online.
Digital Networks Act (DNA)
- The European Commission, supported by European telecoms like Deutsche Telekom are seeking to expand the DNA to include cloud services and its infrastructure.
- This is just a mechanism to increase costs on U.S. digital services while protecting European companies.
Digital Services Tax (DST)
- In addition to the costly regulations and fees imposed by the EU, several of its own member states have implemented country-specific digital services taxes to levy specifically on US companies.
- American tech companies are being shaken down to subsidize the European digital economy.
Positive Case Studies – How Other Countries Are Getting It Right
June 2025
What the Admin is Saying
“Instead of empowering their Workers and creating opportunities, Foreign Governments have instead tried to tax, fine, and hinder American Tech Companies. Both friend and foe have been treating American Tech Companies harshly, as if our Companies are their piggy bank. This will now end! It is my objective to level the playing field, and end these attacks. We are putting these Countries on notice to end their unfair treatment of American Companies, large and small.”
February 2025: President Donald Trump
“We have just been informed that Canada, a very difficult Country to TRADE with… has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American Technology Companies, which is a direct and blatant attack on our Country. They are obviously copying the European Union, which has done the same thing, and is currently under discussion with us, also.”
June 2025: President Donald Trump
“Thank you Canada for removing your Digital Services Tax which was intended to stifle American innovation and would have been a deal breaker for any trade deal with America”
June 2025: United States Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick
“You can expect that countries that have DST…are going to be facing the wrath of U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.”
June 2025:Director of the National Economic Council, Kevin Hassett
“Other countries do pull substantial revenues out the U.S. Treasury and our great internet companies, which are unique to the U.S., are an example. This digital service tax was especially egregious… It is a centerpiece of our tariff negations. When I talk about what we’re pushing back on, we’re pushing back on: tariffs, non tariff measures, currency manipulation, government subsidies and unfair taxation and fines such as the EU does on the same companies.”
June 2025: United States Secretary of the Treasury, Scott Bessent
“With this TRUTH, I put all Countries with Digital Taxes, Legislation, Rules, or Regulations, on notice that unless these discriminatory actions are removed, I, as President of the United States, will impose substantial additional Tariffs on that Country’s Exports to the U.S.A., and institute Export restrictions on our Highly Protected Technology and Chips. America, and American Technology Companies, are neither the “piggy bank” nor the “doormat” of the World any longer.”
August 2025: President Trump
“Europe today “hit” another great American company, Google, with a $3.5 Billion Dollar fine, effectively taking money that would otherwise go to American Investments and Jobs. This is on top of the many other Fines and Taxes that have been issued against Google and other American Tech Companies, in particular. Very unfair, and the American Taxpayer will not stand for it!”
September 2025: President Trump
“The European Union must stop this practice against American Companies, IMMEDIATELY!”
September 2025: President Trump
“During a trip to Brussels, Lutnick called on the EU to “analyze their digital rules, trying to come away with a balance … not put them away, but find a balanced approach that works with us.”
November 2025: United States Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick
“If the EU and EU Member States insist on continuing to restrict, limit, and deter the competitiveness of U.S. service providers through discriminatory means, the United States will have no choice but to begin using every tool at its disposal to counter these unreasonable measures.”





